Cases 61 - 70 of 22,299
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Westerfield v. Williamson et al
as 5:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Shelly Westerfield
Defendant:
James Williamson, Carter-Jones Companies, Inc. doing business as Carter Lumber Company, ESIS, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sullivan v. State of Montana, et al.
as 24-2682
Plaintiff:
RYAN PATRICK SULLIVAN
Defendant:
STATE OF MONTANA, YELLOWSTONE COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY, OFFICER WOLD and others
Michael Burnett v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 24-1366
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANGELO BURNETT
Defendant:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director of MDOC, in her official capacity, LIEUTENANT TAGGET, in individual capacity, LIEUTENANT BORIS, in individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Azar El v. Cabarrus County et al
as 3:2024cv00423
Petitioner:
Rashaud Hussein Azar El doing business as Jerimy Love
Respondent:
Cabarrus County, Cabarrus County Jail, Mike Downs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
