Cases 61 - 70 of 7,023
Chinault v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Clifford Chinault
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Clifford Chaun Loyer v. City of Cypress
as 8:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Clifford Chaun Loyer
Defendant:
City of Cypress
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harel Talasazan v. Robert M. Farrell et al
as 2:2024cv01356
Defendant:
Attorney Poonam Patidar, Robert M. Farrell, Maria R. Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Harel Talasazan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clifford Frost, Jr. v. Dana Nessel
as 24-1132
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD JAMES FROST, JR.
Defendant:
DANA NESSEL, Attorney General of the State of Michigan; in official capacity
CLIFFORD v. WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON, FCI - FT. DIX
as 1:2024cv00870
Petitioner:
STEPHEN FRANCIS CLIFFORD
Respondent:
WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON, FCI - FT. DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nicholson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Clifford Thomas Nicholson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
US Attorney-Social Security Noticing and SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
KING v. USA
as 1:2024cv00289
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD R. KING, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States v. Brandon Clifford
as 24-1234
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Brandon Clifford
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
