Cases 61 - 70 of 77
Crump v. Boester et al
as 4:2014cv01975
Plaintiff:
Mario Crump
Defendant:
Matthew E. Boester , Gregory P. Schaffer , John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Allen et al v. Gray et al
as 4:2014cv01398
Plaintiff:
George Allen, Jr. and Lonzetta Taylor
Defendant:
Richard Gray, Bettye Battle-Turner, Thomas Irwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Slay Jr. et al
as 4:2014cv01373
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Anthony Smith
Defendant:
Francis Slay, Jr. , Thomas Irwin , Bettye Battle-Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeal v. Slay et al
as 4:2014cv01353
Plaintiff:
Shannon Renee McNeal
Defendant:
Francis G. Slay , Thomas Irwin , Bettye Battle-Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RLI Insurance Company v. Samco Construction Company Inc et al
as 4:2014cv00217
Plaintiff:
RLI Insurance Company
Defendant:
Samco Construction Company Inc , Carl D Samuels and Kathleen A Samuels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Samuel et al v. Golden Corral Corporation
as 3:2013cv00525
Defendant:
Golden Corral Corporation
Plaintiff:
Marliese D. Samuel and Richard Samuel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Furniture Brands International, Inc. v. Samuels
as 4:2013cv00500
Plaintiff:
Furniture Brands International, Inc.
Defendant:
Harry D. Samuels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Samuel v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 2:2013cv00076
Petitioner:
Mickey D. Samuel
Respondent:
Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodell v. Fazekas-Hardy et al
as 2:2012cv15051
Plaintiff:
D Samuel Goodell
Defendant:
S. Fazekas-Hardy and John Doe
Broderick-Home v. United States et al
as 4:2012cv00373
Plaintiff:
Margaret Elizabeth Broderick-Home
Defendant:
United States, Robert Miskell, Darion Fishman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
