Cases 61 - 70 of 71
Williams v. United States of America
as 4:2008cv00304
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Dan Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Dan Williams v. Zurn Industries, Inc.
as PAE/2:08-CV-66951
Defendant:
Zurn Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dan Williams
Dan Williams v. Zurn Industries, Inc.
as PAE/2:08-CV-66950
Defendant:
Zurn Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dan Williams
Barnett v. Jackson County Detention Center et al
as 4:2008cv00025
Plaintiff:
Mark Eugene Barnett
Defendant:
Jackson County Detention Center, Truman Medical Center, George Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Microsoft Corporation v. Bisdex, Inc. et al
as 7:2007cv01990
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation and Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
Bisdex, Inc. and Dan Williams
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Bolden-Ford et al v. BP Amoco Chemical Company et al
as 3:2007cv00491
Plaintiff:
Peggy Bolden-Ford, Irene Bookman, Lawrence Bookman and others
Defendant:
BP Amoco Chemical Company, BP Amoco Polymers Incorporated, BP Corporation North America Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Weber v. Alden et al
as 2:2007cv05029
Plaintiff:
Charles W Weber
Defendant:
Gil Alden, L Young, Barker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Lappin et al
as 1:2007cv00153
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Dan Williams
Defendant:
Harley G Lappin, Kathleen H Sawyer and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Williams v. Lappin et al
as 6:2007cv00104
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Dan Williams
Defendant:
Harley G Lappin, Kathleen H Sawyer and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
MUHAMMAD v. GERACE et al
as 1:2007cv00097
Plaintiff:
FARAUD K. MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
DAN GERACE, ELOIS D. HARRIS, JOHN MUHAMMAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
