Cases 61 - 69 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Oliver v. Miner et al
as 3:2007cv01282
Petitioner:
Robert E. Oliver
Respondent:
Warden Miner, US Parole Com'n, District of Columbia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Oliver v. Ayers
as 3:2007cv02233
Petitioner:
Luke E. Oliver
Respondent:
Robert Ayers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oliver et al v. Priority Healthcare Pharmacy, Inc
as 4:2007cv04009
Plaintiff:
Richard E Oliver, Richard E Oliver, Brenda Oliver and others
Defendant:
Priority Healthcare Pharmacy, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Madrid v. Oliver
as 2:2007cv00335
Plaintiff:
Stephen Madrid
Defendant:
Mark E. Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
E. OLIVER CAPTIAL GROUP, LLC v. COMMNET SUPPLY, LLC
as 3:2007cv00204
Plaintiff:
E. OLIVER CAPTIAL GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
COMMNET SUPPLY, LLC
Counter Claimant:
COMMNET SUPPLY, LLC
Counter Defendant:
E. OLIVER CAPTIAL GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Turner v. Rupf et al
as 3:2005cv02297
Plaintiff:
Edward Turner
Defendant:
Warren E. Rupf, Joe Caruso, M.D. James Rael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OLIVER V DVA
as 02-7034
Respondent-Appellee:
ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and others
Claimant-Appellant:
DANNY E. OLIVER, DANNY E. OLIVER, DANNY E. OLIVER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
