Cases 61 - 70 of 1,108
ELKINS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14868
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW ELKINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re Naturalization Ceremony 6/30/2023
as 3:2023mc80168
In Re:
Naturalization Ceremony, Mohammad Ebrahim Ahmadi, Naqibullah Ahmadzai and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15859
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Britt v. Shook et al
as 2:2023cv02077
Plaintiff:
Joshua Roy Britt
Defendant:
Jacob Shook, Jail Administrator Jacob Shook, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lothes v. City of Elkins et al
as 2:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lothes
Defendant:
City of Elkins, Elkins Police Department and Christopher Boatwright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blainey Elkins v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 23-35367
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BLAINEY O. ELKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
ELKINS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11303
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D ELKINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shell v. Otwell et al
as 4:2023cv04053
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Shell
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Steven Otwell, Lieutenant Ghormley, Nurse Practitioner Darrell Wayne Elkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shell v. Elkin et al
as 6:2023cv06058
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Shell
Defendant:
Nurse Practitioner Darrell Wayne Elkin, Captain Josh Lingo, Jail Administrator Steven Otwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ELKINS et al v. SOUTHEASTERN INDIANA HEALTH MANAGEMENT INC DBA COLUMBUS REGIONAL HEALTH
as 1:2023cv00765
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ELKINS and ANNIE ELKINS
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN INDIANA HEALTH MANAGEMENT INC DBA COLUMBUS REGIONAL HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
