Cases 61 - 70 of 85
Cason v. John Doe 1-4 et al
as 1:2016cv03710
Plaintiff:
Michael Cason
Defendant:
FJC Security Services Inc., Federal Protective Service Officers John Doe 1-4, Joshua Primrose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
VANEGAS v. FEDERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICE. et al
as 1:2015cv01978
Plaintiff:
VICENTE B. VANEGAS
Defendant:
FEDERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICE, GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Derric Burks v. Alfredo Luna et al
as 2:2015cv07406
Defendant:
Ricardo Arriaga, Does, Federal Protective Service and others
Plaintiff:
Derric Burks
Odigwe et al v. Social Security Administration et al
as 2:2015cv01497
Plaintiff:
Uzoma Odigwe and Chuks Odigwe
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Federal Protective Services, Akal Security Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sutton v. Paragon Systems Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv09761
Plaintiff:
Sandra Sutton
Defendant:
Paragon Systems Inc., Security Consultants Group Inc. and Federal Protective Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
