Cases 61 - 70 of 115
Mary Fran Torpey v. Mattel Inc et al
as 2:2013cv01700
Defendant:
Fisher-Price Inc and Mattel Inc
Plaintiff:
Mary Fran Torpey
Brandon Butler v. Mattel Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00306
Plaintiff:
Brandon Butler
Defendant:
Does, Fisher-Price Inc and Mattel Inc
Harris et al v. Fisher-Price Inc et al
as 1:2013cv00076
Plaintiff:
Jason Dane Harris and Rachael Marie Dabbs-Harris
Defendant:
Fisher-Price Inc, Mattel Inc, Target Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TQP Development, LLC v. Mattel, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00645
Plaintiff:
TQP Development, LLC
Defendant:
Mattel, Inc. , Fisher-Price, Inc. and American Girl Brands, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cooper Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Fisher-Price, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv03202
Plaintiff:
Cooper Hosiery Mills, Inc.
Defendant:
Fisher-Price, Inc. , Mattel, Inc. and Daystar Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANDERSON, JR. v. FISHER-PRICE, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv00868
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER D. ANDERSON, JR.
Defendant:
FISHER-PRICE, INC. and MATTEL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Malloy et al v. Toys "R" Us-Delaware, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv10892
Plaintiff:
Gerald Malloy and Lisa Malloy
Defendant:
Toys "R" Us-Delaware, Inc. and Fisher-Price, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fisher-Price, Inc. et al v. Kids II, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00988
Plaintiff:
Fisher-Price, Inc. and Mattel, Inc.
Defendant:
Kids II, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Riches v. Consumer Product, et al
as 10-1375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES, DBA Harry Markopolos
Defendant - Appellee:
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY IMPROVEMENT ACT, CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION, NANCY NORD and others
Clay et al v. Fisher Price et al
as 2:2010cv00560
Plaintiff:
George Clay , Alicia Clay and McKayla Clay
Defendant:
Fisher Price , Walmart Store #1478 and Walmart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
