Cases 61 - 70 of 199
Oppenheimer v. Pugh et al
as 1:2021cv00335
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Danny F. Pugh, Paul S. Heathman and Mountain Dreams Realty of WNC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Gordon v. Spivey
as 2:2021cv00037
Plaintiff:
JOHN GORDON
Defendant:
GORDEN W. SPIVEY, ESQ. and Gorden W. Spivey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Wright et al
as 5:2021ct03104
Defendant:
Sgt. Smith, Sgt. Thompson, Lt. Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Freddie Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARROYO et al v. SOUTHWOOD REALTY COMPANY et al
as 1:2021cv00219
Plaintiff:
VALERIE ARROYO and DEREK OLIVARIA
Defendant:
SOUTHWOOD REALTY COMPANY, LUZ GORDON, CITY OF CONCORD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00256
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Davis v. Bridgestone Corporation et al
as 3:2021cv00149
Defendant:
Gordon Knapp, Bridgestone Corporation, Hector Lockamy and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Antonio Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GORDON et al v PHILLIP et al
as 1:2021cv00029
Defendant:
LAWRENCE HARRIS, III, JARVIS ADDISON, VICTOR A. SUAREZ MELENDEZ and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ELLERSHAW, TRAVIS GORDON and FTP INVESTMENTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00192
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00757
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Oppenheimer v. A.C. Schultes of Carolina, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00297
Defendant:
Does 1-10 and A.C. Schultes of Carolina, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
