Cases 61 - 70 of 195
Morris v. Smith et al
as 3:2015cv00277
Petitioner:
Brent Eli Morris
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Greg Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Runningshield v. King et al
as 0:2015cv01912
Plaintiff:
Matt Runningshield
Defendant:
John King , Charles Hammer , Greg Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corley v. Vance et al
as 1:2015cv01800
Plaintiff:
Royce Corley
Defendant:
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., David Stuart, John Temples and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grace et al v. Sparks et al
as 2:2015cv01505
Plaintiff:
Tina M. Grace and Larry Grace
Defendant:
C. Michael Sparks, Michael Thornsbury, Jay Lockard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corley v. Vance et al
as 1:2015cv00232
Defendant:
Backpage.com, LLC, Capital One, N.A., Giancarlo Cavallo and others
Plaintiff:
Royce Corley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv30108
Plaintiff:
Brandi Smith and Greg Smith
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAZZARELLA et al v. BRADY et al
as 2:2014cv05654
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MAZZARELLA , JEFFREY MAZZARELLA and STEVEN MAZZARELLA
Defendant:
MICHAEL BRADY , JOSEPH GANSKY , GREG SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hager v. Smith et al
as 3:2014cv00490
Petitioner:
Joseph B. Hager
Defendant:
Nevada Attorney General
Respondent:
Greg Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heiman v. Smith et al
as 3:2014cv00471
Petitioner:
Ronald Heiman
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Greg Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomley et al v. Synergy Refrigeration, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02745
Plaintiff:
Neeka Thomley , Ricky W. Cochran , Greg Smith and others
Defendant:
Synergy Refrigeration, Inc. and Doug Sweet
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
