Cases 61 - 70 of 100
Hendy et al v. Newrez d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
as 0:2026cv60704
Plaintiff:
Norma E. Hendy, Courtney Copeland and Brandon Ingram
Defendant:
Newrez d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Ingraym v. 16th Circuit Court et al
as 0:2026cv01006
Plaintiff:
Lewis Anthony Ingram
Defendant:
16th Circuit Court, Solicitors Office, Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Willie Benton, Jr. v. City of Akron, OH, et al
as 26-3186
Plaintiff:
WILLIE R. BENTON, JR.
Defendant:
CITY OF AKRON, OH, SUMMIT COUNTY, OH, AKRON CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
INGRAM v. NEWMAN et al
as 1:2026cv00059
Petitioner:
JOSEPH INGRAM
Respondent:
WARDEN NEWMAN and FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Orr v. State of New York, et al
as 1:2026cv00332
Plaintiff:
Alana Marie Orr
Defendant:
Anthony T. McGinty, Keri Savona, Amy Ingram and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GRANTLEY v. TATUM et al
as 3:2026cv01515
Plaintiff:
DERRICK GRANTLEY
Defendant:
TORI TATUM, BELSER, M INGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv00490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
