Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 100
Fullybright v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al.
as 26-3768
Plaintiff: RUDOLF DOHOUNGBE FULLYBRIGHT
Defendant: AMAZON.COM, INC., BLURB, INC. and INGRAM CONTENT GROUP, LLC
Belfield v. Irving, et al.
as 1:2026cv01632
Plaintiff: Kali Jaheim Belfield
Defendant: A. Irving, Marshall, Amens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ingram v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2026cv02219
Plaintiff: Lewis Anthony Ingram and Lewis Anthony Ingram,
Defendant: South Carolina Department of Corrections, Warden Wallace and Dr. S. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Komorek v. Ingram et al
as 2:2026cv00658
Plaintiff: Stephen Komorek
Defendant: Sarah Ingram, Jackson County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Tedd E. Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ferrell Hospital Community Foundation v. Johnson et al
as 3:2026cv00720
Defendant: David E Johnson, Johnson Johnson Crabtree Architects, P.C., Ingram Civil Engineering Group, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Ferrell Hospital Community Foundation doing business as Ferrell Hospital
Cross-Plaintiff: Doster Construction Company, Inc.
Cross-Defendant: H.E. Mitchell Construction and F.W. Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ingram v. Lyft, Inc.
as 4:2026cv03892
Defendant: Lyft, Inc.
Plaintiff: Mailka Rosina Ingram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Knight v. Bowles et al
as 2:2026cv00465
Plaintiff: RaQuan Knight
Defendant: K. Bowles, M. Gill, C.O. Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ingram v. Mudd et al
as 2:2026cv02129
Plaintiff: Michelle Ingram
Defendant: Andrew Mudd and Jacqueline Lacy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02554
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?