Cases 61 - 70 of 234
Behr v. Campbell et al
as 9:2018cv80221
Plaintiff:
Rebekka Anne Behr
Defendant:
James Campbell and Palm Beach County School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Crooker v. Campbell et al
as 3:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
Michael Alan Crooker
Defendant:
James Campbell and Doug Pina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv05174
Plaintiff:
James Campbell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOSQUERA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv02160
Plaintiff:
OMAR ANCHICO MOSQUERA, CALVIN SOLOMON, MARK ANDREWS and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, KNOWN AND UNKNOWN UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS and KNOWN AND UNKNOWN ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stuart et al
as 1:2017cv00107
Plaintiff:
Frank Stuart , Jason Adams , Michael Barnes and others
Defendant:
Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Campbell v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 9:2017cv01748
Plaintiff:
James Campbell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
James Campbell v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI, et al
as 17-1305
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY
Phillips v. Monroe et al
as 2:2016cv01415
Plaintiff:
William Phillips
Defendant:
Christopher A Monroe , Gerald R Schlosser, III , Cherokee County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv06704
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CAMPBELL v. PATRICT et al
as 2:2016cv04021
Petitioner:
JAMES CAMPBELL
Respondent:
GEORGE PATRICT and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF __________
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
