Cases 61 - 70 of 99
USA v. James Dixon
as 13-3737
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES DIXON, #05385-070
Dixon v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2013cv00462
Petitioner:
Anthony James Dixon
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carbajal, et al v. Warner, et al
as 13-1139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEAN CARBAJAL and VICTORIA CARBAJAL
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROL WARNER, Chief of Probation for the Seventh Judicial District , in her individual capacity, DAVID ROMERO, Superior probation Officer for the Seventh Judicial District, in his individual capacity, JOE QUINTANA, Probation Officer for the Seventh Judicial District, in his individual capacity and others
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. James Dixon, Jr.
as 2:2012cv14065
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
James Dixon, Jr.
USA v. Dixon et al
as 6:2012cv00154
Defendant:
Jasper J. Dixon, Unknown Spouse of Jasper J. Dixon , Unknown Heirs of Jasper J. Dixon and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Robert Dixon v. James Yates, et al
as 12-15508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT JAMES DIXON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES, Warden and J. DIEP
Dixon v. Neaubacher et al
as 1:2012cv01213
Plaintiff:
James Dixon
Defendant:
Matthew Neaubacher and Albert Naus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Neaubacher et al
as 1:2012cv00045
Plaintiff:
James Dixon
Defendant:
C/O Neaubacher, C/O Nos and Mansfield Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Robert Dixon v. James Yates, et al
as 11-17813
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT JAMES DIXON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES, Warden, IGBINOZA, Dr. and J. DIEP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
