Cases 61 - 70 of 228
CARTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv02837
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter v. New York City Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv03980
Plaintiff:
James Carter
Defendant:
New York City Department of Corrections, Warden Kisa Smalls, New York State Division of Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Azor-El et al v. New York City Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv03650
Defendant:
New York City Department of Corrections, City of New York, Warden Kisa Smalls and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Gomez, Ronnie Cole, James Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Tyson, Sr. v. Julie Hackenmiller, et al
as 20-1911
Defendant / Appellee:
Gary Maynard, Julie Hackenmiller, Ron Wyse and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
CARTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv54175
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boling v. JUUL Labs, Inc.
as 3:2020cv02004
Defendant:
Juul Labs Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Carter Boling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Boling v. JUUL Labs, Inc.
as 5:2020cv00089
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Carter Boling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv20014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Herrin v. Villasana et al
as 1:2019cv00545
Defendant:
Mitchell Newman, Rebecca Cloud, Officer Josh Hancock and others
Plaintiff:
James Mark Herrin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nessa et al v. Schuster et al
as 3:2019cv08315
Defendant:
Unknown Anhult, Doug Schuster, Don Bischoff and others
Plaintiff:
Michelle Lee Beitia, Gary James Carter, Ashley Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
