Cases 61 - 70 of 53,698
Barmore v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01442
Plaintiff:
Keith D. Barmore
Defendant:
P. Myers, Stevens, M Foureh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seiple v. Willys, Inc. et al.
as 3:2024cv00965
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Seiple
Defendant:
Willys, Inc., Devonshire REIT II, Inc., Devonshire REIT II Operating Partnership LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Hunt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05427
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Mueller Hunt
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Blochowicz v. The United States
as 1:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Blochowicz
Defendant:
The United States, The United States; Jill E. Steinberg, The United States; Merrick B. Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Harell v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv02127
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Harrell
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
New England Phoenix Company, Inc. v. Safford
as 2:2024mc14173
Defendant:
Jeffrey A Safford and Jeffery A Safford
Plaintiff:
New England Phoenix Company, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Pittman v. Clarke et al
as 1:2024cv04279
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
Jason Clarke and Jeffrey Roy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richardson v. Citrola et al
as 1:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Richardson
Defendant:
Matthew Citrola and J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Walker v. Adams et al
as 5:2024cv03314
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Walker and Jeffrey Walker
Defendant:
Chief Adams, Sgt. Callaway, Lt. Clasal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
