Cases 61 - 70 of 148
Thompson v. Crone et al
as 1:2018cv00236
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mondrez Thompson
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Crone, Lieutenant Baker, Correctional Officer LeVasseur and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Nureni v. Foxwell et al
as 1:2018cv01169
Plaintiff:
Muyideen Nureni
Defendant:
Warden Foxwell and Kitchen Supervisor Troxell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booth v. William Dickerson Facility Kitchen Supervisor et al
as 2:2018cv11103
Plaintiff:
Rodgerick Booth
Defendant:
William Dickerson Facility Kitchen Supervisor and William Dickerson Facility Chaplain
Lawrence v. Taylor et al
as 1:2017cv05094
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lawrence
Defendant:
Taylor, Thomas, Major Cash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thad Thompson v. Katherine Torres, et al
as 17-17265
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THAD THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHERINE TORRES, PALEKA, Cpt., JOHN DOE, Residency Dept. Supervisor and others
Scooter Robinson v. Frank Shaw, et al
as 17-60695
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOOTER LYNN ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK SHAW, TIRA JACKSON, Warden, GABRIEL WALKER, Warden and others
Thompson v. Torres et al
as 1:2017cv00319
Plaintiff:
Thad Thompson
Defendant:
Katherine Torres, Paleka, Residency Dept. Supervisor (John Doe) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Piotrowski v. Horseshoe Casino et al
as 2:2017cv00157
Plaintiff:
Matthew Piotrowski
Defendant:
Horseshoe Casino, Jack Binion, Unknown Kitchen Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Piotrowski v. Horseshoe Casino et al
as 1:2017cv01760
Plaintiff:
Matthew Piotrowski
Defendant:
Horseshoe Casino, Jack Binion, Unknown Kitchen Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ali v. Jones, et al
as 17-6050
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MURTAZA ALI
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director, ROBERT PATTON, Director, MARK KNUTSON, Director's Designee and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
