Cases 61 - 70 of 75
Larry Wilson v. A.r. Wilfley & Sons, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-77906
Defendant:
A.r. Wilfley & Sons
Plaintiff:
Larry Wilson
United States v. Martin Wilson
as 09-3021
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Martin Larry Wilson
WILSON v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77906
Plaintiff:
LARRY WILSON and LARRY WILSON
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Alpha Janitorial Services, Inc v. GCA Services Group, Incorporat
as 09-1853
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALPHA JANITORIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
GCA SERVICES GROUP, INCORPORATED, CHARLES SPENCER, BUDDY HELTON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1911
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wilson v. Newborn et al
as 6:2009cv06025
Plaintiff:
Larry Wilson
Defendant:
Jaqueine Newborn, Tim Patterson, Rick Loy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. Newborn et al
as 6:2009cv06021
Plaintiff:
Charles Williams, Larry Wilson, Steven D Cody and others
Defendant:
Jaqueine Newborn, Tim Patterson, Rick Loy and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Alpha Janitorial Services Inc v. GCA Services Group Inc et al
as 9:2008cv03094
Plaintiff:
Alpha Janitorial Services Inc
Defendant:
GCA Services Group Inc, Charles Spencer, Buddy Helton and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hudgins v. Clifton et al
as 4:2008cv00744
Plaintiff:
James Hudgins
Defendant:
Charles Clifton and Larry Wilson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Beneficial Investment v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 5:2008cv00360
Plaintiff:
Beneficial Investment, Michael Blair, Denise Blair and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
