Cases 61 - 70 of 21,246
Touchmark Hotel Group, LLC, v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company et al
as 3:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
TOUCHMARK HOTEL GROUP, LLC d/b/a HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS
Defendant:
Mt. Hawley Insurance Company and Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ramirez, Personally and on Behalf of the Estate of Teresa Ramirez v. State Farm Lloyds et al
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ramirez, Personally and on Behalf of the Estate of Teresa Ramirez
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds and Okafor Ogochukwu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Taylor et al v. EQT TGHL Exploration, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Ralph Taylor and Lloyd Baker
Defendant:
EQT TGHL Exploration, LLC and Tug Hill Operating, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Antonetti et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2024cv01572
Plaintiff:
Kenny Antonetti and Wanda Antonetti
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Thomas v. Pate et al
as 5:2024ct03099
Plaintiff:
Daniel Isaiah Thomas
Defendant:
Lt. Pate, Robeson County, Burnis Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lloyd v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02000
Plaintiff:
Lacey S. Lloyd
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
West v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2024cv01563
Plaintiff:
Lucinda West
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Davis v. Franklin Correctional Institution et al
as 5:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Anthony Davis
Defendant:
Franklin Correctional Institution, Region 1 Pharmacy and FNU Pawkk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
