Cases 61 - 70 of 2,836
Harrington v. Lancaster
as 24-20230
Defendant:
Jared Lindsay and James Lancaster
Plaintiff:
Tyler Harrington
WATSON v. SOMERSET COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00184
Defendant:
MICHAEL PIKE, SOMERSET COUNTY, DALE P LANCASTER and others
Plaintiff:
MILLAR WATSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis-Lancaster v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04055
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. administrator d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC,, Namaste Laboratories LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Karen D. Davis-Lancaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ATKINS v. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI SOMERSET et al
as 3:2024cv00105
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI SOMERSET and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LANCASTER COUNTY, PA
Petitioner:
WILLIAM ROBERT ATKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-3119
Petitioner:
DAVID BENNETT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party:
MONROE DETENTION CENTER, YOLO COUNTY JAIL, WELL PATH DIRECTOR and others
Marshall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv03025
Plaintiff:
Jeff Kinkaid, William Kelly, Ken Kingman and others
Defendant:
UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
LANCASTER et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE JUNE LANCASTER and PAUL LANCASTER
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
LLOYD v. MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2024cv01993
Plaintiff:
SUSAN LLOYD
Defendant:
MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER MARTIN, OFFICER WICZKOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lancaster v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02195
Plaintiff:
Michelle Lancaster
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WATKINS v. SUPERINTENDENT RIVELLO et al
as 5:2024cv01942
Petitioner:
LEWIS T. WATKINS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT RIVELLO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
