Cases 61 - 70 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
KENDRE v. RUBIO et al
as 1:2026cv02445
Plaintiff:
SHRIKANT RAMCHANDRA KENDRE
Defendant:
MARCO RUBIO, JOHN ARMSTRONG, LAURA E. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Ramirez et al v. Apex Bank
as 7:2026cv00316
Plaintiff:
Rene Ramirez and Laura Ramirez
Defendant:
Apex Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
TUCKER v. PROGRESSIVE PREMIER INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS
as 1:2026cv00097
Plaintiff:
LAURA R TUCKER
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE PREMIER INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
GAUTAM et al v. JANIE AND JACK, LLC
as 2:2026cv02428
Plaintiff:
DIVYA GAUTAM, LAURA HERRERA and XENIA HABEKOSS
Defendant:
JANIE AND JACK, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Campbell v. Diaz
as 3:2026cv07036
Plaintiff:
Phillip Campbell
Defendant:
Laura L. Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Schulmann v. Conrad et al
as 3:2026cv00953
Plaintiff:
Monica Schulmann
Defendant:
Robert J. Conrad, Eric Komitee, Margo K. Brodie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
