Cases 61 - 70 of 10,721
(PC) Davis v. Mandrigal et al
as 2:2024cv01296
Plaintiff:
Maurice Daronte Davis
Defendant:
Z. Mandrigal, T. Harris, Hamblin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shuron Barksdale v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6289
Petitioner:
SHURON MAURICE BARKSDALE
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Department of Corrections
BOYKINS v. GILBERT et al
as 1:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
MAURICE BOYKINS
Defendant:
GILBERT, GORD, UNIT TEAM MANAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crum v. Florida Commission on Offender Review et al
as 3:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Jody Maurice Crum
Defendant:
Florida Commission on Offender Review, Mark Hiers, Melinda N. Coonrod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dominick Jones v. Linsia, et al
as 24-1392
Plaintiff:
DOMINICK MAURICE JONES
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LINSIA, Kent County Correctional Facility, personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GUNWIN, Kent County Correctional Facility, personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LAKE, Kent County Correctional Facility, personal capacity and others
Brown v. Lafayette Federal Credit Union, et al.
as 24-2839
Plaintiff:
WINSTON MAURICE BROWN
Defendant:
LAFAYETTE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, HFS FINANCIAL and DOES 1-100
United States v. Franklin
as 24-3066
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MAURICE FRANKLIN, JR.
Jones v. Linsia et al
as 1:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Dominick Maurice Jones
Defendant:
Unknown Linsia, Unknown Gunwin, Unknown Lake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCWILLIAMS v. MURPHY
as 5:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
MAURICE MCWILLIAMS
Defendant:
P MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lacy v. Villalobos et al
as 4:2024cv00896
Plaintiff:
Antonio Maurice Lacy
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Dana Sullivan, Nurse Practitioner Crystal Mable, UTMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
