Cases 61 - 70 of 640
JONES v. GRANT et al
as 1:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
BRANDON GRANT, DARRON GRANGER, DUSTIN ARMSTRONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as Amtrak, BNSF Railway Company, Nordby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Jones v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 3:2023cv15803
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, Patheon Inc., Pfizer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Jones
as 23-60029
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Jones
JONES v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sampson, Jr et al v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sampson, Jr
Defendant:
Michael Jones and All of South Suburban Swat Team Members
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Jones v. City of St. Louis, et al
as 22-3624
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Michael Jones
Defendant / Appellant:
City of St. Louis, Jeff Carson, Michael Guzy and others
Defendant:
Charlene Deeken
USA v. Jones
as 22-30770
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Jones
King v. Crown Plaza Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2022cv00900
Plaintiff:
Antoinette King
Defendant:
Executive Hotel Management, Inc., Scott Michelet, Crown Plaza Baton Rouge and others
Not Classified By Court:
Michael Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jones v. Foley
as 1:2022cv02033
Petitioner:
Michael Jones
Respondent:
Warden Keith Foley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
