Cases 61 - 70 of 312
NISCHAL et al v. NISCHAL
as 2:2019cv03403
Plaintiff:
NISSEN HOSPITALITY INC., SELF-REALIZATION LLC and MANU NISCHAL
Defendant:
NARINDER NISCHAL
Pless v. Clark et al
as 3:2019cv00326
Defendant:
Charlotte Walker, Kimberly Connor, Elizabeth Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Jamecia Teiony Pless
Cause Of Action: Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. v. Manus Products, Inc.
as 1:2019cv02852
Plaintiff:
Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc.
Defendant:
Manus Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Produce Exch. of L.A., et al
as 2:2019mc00097
Defendant:
Willardson Co., Inc., Sidney Feldstein, Southern California Egg Council and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Manu et al v. E. El Camino Real Social Security Local Office et al
as 3:2019cv00796
Defendant:
Cortez Ramos and E. El Camino Real Social Security Local Office
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Manu and Barbara Manu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Manu et al v. City of Oceanside Community Development Commission (Housing Division) , et al.
as 3:2019cv00798
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Manu, Barbara Manu and Charles Mensah
Defendant:
City of Oceanside Community Development Commission (Housing Division), Margery M. Pierce, Nancy Minglana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Desai v. Navigators Insurance Company et al
as 8:2019cv00984
Defendant:
Seema Desai, Don Defosset, Scott Segal and others
Plaintiff:
Akshay M. Desai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Manu v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 3:2019cv00592
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank
Plaintiff:
Barbara Manu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Dutt v. Barr
as 19-719
Respondent:
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Manu Dutt
HASH v. CITY OF GREENSBURG, et al.
as 1:2019cv01157
Plaintiff:
Dan Manus, Linda Hash and Kathy Reynolds
Defendant:
City of Greensburg
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
