Cases 61 - 70 of 380
Williams et al v. Wells et al
as 8:2021cv00986
Plaintiff:
Hugh Williams, George Vaughan, Esq. and Mary Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Keenan Cofield, Berri A. Wells and And All Other Occupants Dr. Keenan Confield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Saul
as 2:2021cv00034
Plaintiff:
Diana Marie Williams
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams et al v. Wells
as 8:2021cv01003
Defendant:
Berri Wells
Plaintiff:
Mrs. Marie Williams and Mr. Hugh F. Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Aldridge et al v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00868
Plaintiff:
James Cole, Daphne Tyler, Laverne Boone and others
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Jacqueline Thompson, Pelicia Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00963
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Williams v. School Board of Seminole County Public Schools
as 6:2021cv00021
Defendant:
School Board of Seminole County and School Board of Seminole County Public Schools
Plaintiff:
Mary Williams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Williams v. Saul
as 3:2020cv50490
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Marie Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Williams Barnes v. Saul
as 3:2020cv01765
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Lady Marie Williams Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc
Williams v. Saul
as 1:2020cv03247
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Plaintiff:
Tanya Marie Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
