Cases 61 - 70 of 525
Ashley Noonan v. Consolidated Shoe Company, Inc.
as 21-2328
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASHLEY NICOLE NOONAN, f/k/a Ashley Culpepper
Defendant / Appellee:
CONSOLIDATED SHOE COMPANY, INC.
NOONAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv03234
Plaintiff:
THOMAS NOONAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Noonan v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv09021
Plaintiff:
Jocelyn Noonan
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc. formerly doing business as PAX Labs, Inc. formerly doing business as Ploom Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NOONAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02753
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHANE NOONAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McLaughlin v. City of Methuen et al
as 1:2021cv11846
Plaintiff:
Ashley McLaughlin
Defendant:
Methuen, City of, Tracey Noonan, Richard Sawyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Juarez v. Friend et al
as 2:2021cv01161
Plaintiff:
David C Juarez
Defendant:
Bradley Friend and Patric J Noonan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOONAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv59492
Plaintiff:
KEVIN NOONAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edward L. Clark , Jr. v. The State of California et al
as 8:2021cv01565
Plaintiff:
Edward L. Clark, Jr.
Defendant:
The State of California, Barry Michaelson, The Law Offices Moshtael Family Law and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barrett v. GEO et al
as 3:2021cv01603
Plaintiff:
Isaiah LaMar Barrett
Defendant:
GEO, J. Mora, L. Guillen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-2661
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
