Cases 61 - 70 of 90
Golodner v. Nott et al
as 3:2012cv00563
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Golodner
Defendant:
Deanna Nott , Todd Bergeson , Josh Bergeson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Athey Development Corporation, Inc. v. 2 Point Cafe, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00820
Plaintiff:
Athey Development Corporation, Inc.
Defendant:
2 Point Cafe, LLC and Kevin Nott
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Peter Huk et al v. County of Santa Barbara et al
as 2:2012cv02317
Defendant:
Christel Barros, County of Santa Barbara, Kathy Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Huk and Beverly Raff
Bostic v. McGinnis et al
as 1:2011cv01413
Plaintiff:
Henry A Bostic
Defendant:
Douglas C McGinnis, Gary Millard, Steve Nott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nott v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2011cv00338
Plaintiff:
Melinda Nott
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wound Care Centers Inc, et al v. David Catalane, et al
as 11-3436
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WOUND CARE CENTERS INC and DIVERSIFIED CLINICAL SER INC
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID CATALANE, GENE BATTISTELLA, MICHAEL NOTTE and others
Novoa Garrido v. Buona Notte Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv05476
Plaintiff:
Jose David Novoa Garrido
Defendant:
Buona Notte Inc., Buona Notte, LLC, Buona Notte Ristorante and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Turner v. Karnes et al
as 3:2011cv01290
Plaintiff:
Kevin Turner
Defendant:
Robert Karnes, Anthony Hauck, Arthur Mast and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv02265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WOLK v. OVERLAWYERED.COM et al
as 2:2010cv05856
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR ALAN WOLK
Defendant:
OVERLAWYERED.COM, THE OVERLAWYERED GROUP, WALTER K. OLSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
