Cases 61 - 70 of 147
Ebron v. Taylor
as 7:2020cv00395
Defendant:
Officer Taylor
Plaintiff:
Dontae T. Ebron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Collier et al
as 4:2020cv01735
Defendant:
Major Lighten, Sgt Groover, Asst Warden Clayton and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solis v. Taylor et al
as 3:2020cv00209
Defendant:
Officer Taylor and Lt. Nesbitt
Plaintiff:
Javier Solis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Taylor et al
as 5:2020ct03079
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety, John Does 1-100, Nurse Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Offie Curtis Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rafiq Jones v. OH, et al
as 20-3169
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAFIQ JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION, DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION, individually and in his official capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TAYLOR GRAVES, individually and in his official capacity and others
Harris v. Erdos et al
as 1:2020cv00120
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Annette Chambers-Smith, Barney and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius L. Harris
Interested Party:
State of Ohio, Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2019cv08293
Defendant:
Sgt. Rexford, Major Connor, Officer Forester and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLURE v. TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 5:2019cv01456
Defendant:
Jennifer Tharp, Jessi Valdez, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Robert T. McClure
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wambach v. Hoyt et al
as 2:2019cv00137
Defendant:
Officer Taylor, Robert Hoyt, Officer Sullivan and others
Plaintiff:
Freddy L. Wambach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AIKEN v. PHILPIN et al
as 1:2019cv00191
Defendant:
Sgt. Perry, Sergeant Wilcox, DOCTOR WANTS and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Junior Aiken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
