Cases 61 - 70 of 72
United States of America v. Willis
as 1:2009cv00542
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
James R. Willis
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Coon v. Dallas County {TX} Constables Office, Precinct #3 et al
as 3:2009cv00173
Plaintiff:
Donald James Coon
Defendant:
Dallas County {TX} Constables Office, Precinct #3, Ben Adamcik, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Coon v. Dallas County {Tx} Constables Office, Precinct #3 et al
as 1:2008cv00890
Plaintiff:
Donald James Coon
Defendant:
Dallas County {Tx} Constables Office, Precinct #3, Ben Adamcik, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jones v. George R. Willy, P.C. et al
as 4:2008cv03404
Plaintiff:
Jeremy S. Jones
Defendant:
George R. Willy, P.C. and George R. Willy
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Coon v. Dallas County {Tx} Constbles Office, Precinct #3 et al
as 3:2008cv01832
Plaintiff:
Donald James Coon
Defendant:
Dallas County {Tx} Constbles Office, Precinct #3, Ben Adamcik, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lopez-Patino v. Gant et al
as 2:2008cv01594
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lopez-Patino
Defendant:
Cathryn S Gant, Robert Lucero, Yolanda Fortune and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sonntag v. Clifton et al
as 3:2008cv00303
Plaintiff:
Jason Eric Sonntag
Defendant:
Rhonda Clifton, E. Hill, J. Costas and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Francisco Estrada v. Joe Booker, Jr., et al
as 08-16154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCISCO JAVIER ESTRADA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE W. BOOKER, Jr., Warden, P. COWELS, Captain and R. WILLIS, sued in individual & official capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Partners Trust Bank v. Willis
as 5:2007mc00024
Plaintiff:
Partners Trust Bank
Defendant:
William R Willis, jr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
