Cases 61 - 70 of 12,546
Reaves et al v. City of Auburn et al
as 3:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Siobhan Bianca Reaves and Kathy R. Williams
Defendant:
City of Auburn, City of Auburn Police Department, Cedric Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. DeSantis et al (Pinellas)
as 8:2024cv01130
Petitioner:
Robert Abraham Clark
Respondent:
Ron DeSantis and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henry v. Komarovsky, et al.
as 24-3014
Plaintiff:
DAVID G. HENRY
Defendant:
RON KOMAROVSKY, Police Officer, BRYNN CELLAN and CITY OF TACOMA
Taylor v. Broomfield et al
as 3:2024cv02820
Plaintiff:
Tracy Taylor
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, J. Moeckly and C. Schuyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Securities and Exchange Commission v. FAT Brands, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03913
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
FAT Brands, Inc., Andrew Wiederhorn, Ron Roe and others
US v. Kevin Jones
as 24-4249
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KEVIN RONREGUS JONES, a/k/a Suffolk Ron
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robertson v. Wellpath Care et al
as 2:2024cv02306
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lashea Robertson and Ronnie Lashea Williams
Defendant:
Wellpath Care, Richard Holiday, Latrena Demens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brewer v. White et al
as 5:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Felicia Brewer
Defendant:
FNU White, Grace Trahan, Ron Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
