Cases 61 - 70 of 457
Hill v. Dart et al
as 1:2021cv03612
Plaintiff:
Clarence T Hill
Defendant:
Tom Dart and Superintendant Seaton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEATON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv15884
Plaintiff:
TREVOR SEATON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seaton v. Atos Healthcare Services, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01526
Plaintiff:
Marsha Seaton
Defendant:
Atos IT Solutions and Services, Inc., Atos Healthcare Services, LLC and Atos IT Outsourcing Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Malott v. City of Walnut Creek et al
as 3:2021cv01674
Defendant:
City of Walnut Creek, Jay Hill, Will Appel and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Malott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodman v. Boeckmann et al
as 3:2021cv00353
Defendant:
Matthew McSorley, Alan M Bennett, Matthew K Rose and others
Plaintiff:
Joan Goodman
Norman Hollett v. Dennis J. Gilmore et al
as 2:2021cv00525
Defendant:
Martha B. Wyrsch, Dennis J Gilmore, Parker S Kennedy and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Hollett
Esquivel v. Downhole Technology LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00181
Plaintiff:
Nathan Mast, Carlos Esquivel, Bret Nitzsche and others
Defendant:
National Boss Hog Energy Services LLC, The Wellboss Company LLC and Downhole Technology LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Stracener v. ConocoPhillips et al
as 1:2020cv10954
Defendant:
Caroline Maury Devine, Arjun N. Murti, R.A. Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Mondee Stacener and Mondee Stracener
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Pena #625133 et al v. Brown et al
as 2:2020cv00250
Plaintiff:
Parnell Seaton #159030 and Jacinto Pena #625133
Defendant:
Unknown Party #2, Unknown Party #5, Connie Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv06268
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
