Cases 61 - 70 of 462
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv08990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jones v. Townsend
as 1:2021cv01233
Petitioner:
Herbert William Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Jerry Townsend
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2021cv05702
Plaintiff:
Danielle Robinson and Javon McClean
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and William Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Briggs v. Jones et al
as 4:2021cv01200
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Eugene Briggs, Jr.
Defendant:
CO1 William Jones, Sgt. Ethan Jones, Sgt. Michael Thomson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glendrick Gardner v. LFUCG, et al
as 21-5941
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLENDRICK GARDNER
Defendant / Appellee:
LEXINGTON FAYETTE URBAN COUNTY GOVERNMENT, RUSSELL SCOTT, Program Manager, LFUCG Waste Management, JEREMY HOBBS, Former HR, LFUCG and others
JONES III v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv61077
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JONES III
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson et al v. Talentsy, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00724
Plaintiff:
Kyle Anderson, Michael Robinson and Talentsy LLC
Defendant:
Talentsy, Inc., Jake William Jones and Samai Phong Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fd
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv58808
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES et al v. M&J-BIG WATERFRONT TOWN CENTER I, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01312
Plaintiff:
MARIAN JONES and WILLIAM JONES
Defendant:
M&J-BIG WATERFRONT TOWN CENTER I, LLC and AMC ENTERTAINMENT HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Donovan
as 2:2021cv01109
Plaintiff:
William Jones
Defendant:
Mike Donovan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
