Cases 71 - 80 of 4,276
Ritchey et al v. RTD Carriers, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Robby Ritchey and Stephanie Ritchey
Defendant:
RTD Carriers, Inc., DG Rodriguez Express, Inc., Martin Monreal-Alvarado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
US v. Julio Alvarado Dubon
as 24-4076
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JULIO CESAR ALVARADO DUBON
Hughes v. The United States of America
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Jaclyn Hughes, Emily Crawford, Monique Danene Delgado and others
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Alvarado v. Moore et al
as 0:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Juan Alvarado
Defendant:
Isaiah Moore, Matthew McNeely, Joseph LeFevere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez-Alvarado v. Garland
as 24-483
Petitioner:
VICTOR MANUEL RODRIGUEZ-ALVARADO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
ALVARADO v. PISCATAWAY et al
as 2:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ALVARADO
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF. PISCATAWAY, PISCATAWAY POLICE DEPARTMENT, DOMINICK FORLENZA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramon Alvarado, Jr. v. Joseph Beahm, et al
as 24-1126
Plaintiff:
RAMON ALVARADO, JR.
Defendant:
JOSEPH BEAHM, JOHN BIRDYSHAW, BRIAN FOSTER, Warden and others
Juan Alvarado-Gonzalez v. Christopher Thompson, et al
as 24-1122
Plaintiff:
JUAN ALVARADO-GONZALEZ
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON, Warden, Pinckneyville CC, DUSTIN BOWLES, C/O, Pinckneyville CC, MAC-SHANE FRANK, Lieutenant, Pinckneyville CC and others
Alvarado v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Ruby Janet Alvarado
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
