Cases 71 - 80 of 620
Stahl et al v. Skyline Capital Builders LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00528
Plaintiff:
Kraig Stahl, Gregory Loy and K.D. Stahl Construction Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Skyline Capital Builders LLC and Skyline Construction Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Schwendimann v. Stahls' Inc.
as 22-1652
Appellant:
JODI A. SCHWENDIMANN, fka Jodi A. Dalvey
Appellee:
STAHLS' INC.
Pacira Biosciences Inc v. American Society of Anesthesiologists Inc, et al
as 22-1411
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PACIRA BIOSCIENCES INC
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIOLOGISTS INC, EVAN D. KHARASCH, NASIR HUSSAIN and others
Lamar Williams v. Paul Mayhew
as 22-1182
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMAR A. WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL M. MAYHEW, Individual Capacity & Official Capacity, SUZANNE BERGER, Individual Capacity & Official Capacity, MICHAEL E. FIELD, Individual Capacity & Official Capacity and others
Cortney Stahl v. Ron Haynes
as 22-35148
Petitioner / Appellant:
CORTNEY JAMES STAHL
Respondent / Appellee:
RON HAYNES
Stahls' Inc. v. Microtec Technology
as 4:2022cv00854
Plaintiff:
STAHLS INC., d/b/a GroupeSTAHL and Stahls' Inc. A Michigan Corporation doing business as GroupeSTAHL
Defendant:
MICROTEC TECHNOLOGY and ALIBABA GROUP (US) INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Metaldyne M & A Bluffton, LLC. v. Stahl Specialty Company
as 1:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Metaldyne M & A Bluffton, LLC.
Defendant:
Stahl Specialty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Stahl v. SoClean, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00232
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Stahl
Defendant:
SoClean Inc and SOCLEAN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schwendimann v. Stahls' Inc.
as 22-1429
Appellant:
JODI A. SCHWENDIMANN, fka Jodi A. Dalvey
Appellee:
STAHLS' INC.
Schwendimann v. Stahls' Inc.
as 22-1431
Appellant:
JODI A. SCHWENDIMANN, fka Jodi A. Dalvey
Appellee:
STAHLS' INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
