Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 72,624
Arch Specialty Insurance Company v. Hewannora Construction, Inc
as 24-1274
Plaintiff: ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: FELIX PAYNE, ANDREW WILLIAMS, KEREN CAMPBELL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01376
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
USA v. Steven Ross
as 24-11569
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: STEVEN ANDREW ROSS
DAVIDSON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00739
Petitioner: ANDREW DAVIDSON
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Reddell v. Rankin County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff: Joyce Reddell
Defendant: Rankin County, Mississippi, Vitalcore Health Strategies, LLC, David Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andrews v. Prudential Insurance Company Of America
as 8:2024cv02951
Plaintiff: Carrie L Andrews
Defendant: Prudential Insurance Company Of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Pina v. United States
as 4:2024cv02783
Plaintiff: Andrew Jonathan Pina
Defendant: United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wieland v. City and County of Honolulu
as 1:2024cv00215
Plaintiff: Patrick Andrew Wieland
Defendant: City and County of Honolulu, Arthur Logan, Damien Desa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sakhi et al v. Blinken et al
as 1:2024cv01376
Plaintiff: SARAH OBIDULAH SAKHI and HAMED AREFI
Defendant: DEPUTY CHIEF Andrew Schofer, SECRETARY ANTONY J BLINKEN, ASST. SECRETARY RENA BITTER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
ConvergeOne, Inc. v. Waterfield Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00595
Plaintiff: ConvergeOne, Inc.
Defendant: Waterfield Technologies, Inc., Klaus Hillmann, Frank Bryant and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?