Cases 71 - 80 of 98
State of Tennessee et al v. Noble
as 3:2013cv00295
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee, William Haslam, Scott Foster and others
Defendant:
Kathy Noble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Terrance Tribbey, et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc
as 13-80038
Plaintiff - Respondent:
TERRANCE TRIBBEY, ANNETTA JOHNSON, WILLIAM HENDRICKS and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC
Altizer v. Pugh et al
as 7:2013cv00031
Plaintiff:
John Mark Altizer
Defendant:
Harry Pugh and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Terrance Tribbey et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 8:2012cv02048
Defendant:
AAI Development Services Inc, Aaipharma Inc, Aaipharma LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Tammy Altizer, Darlene Barry, Helen Blosser and others
Altizer v. Gib Lewis Unit
as 9:2012cv00165
Plaintiff:
Christopher Altizer
Defendant:
Gib Lewis Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Altizer v. Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
as 7:2012cv00360
Petitioner:
Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooper v Middlebrooks et al
as 5:2011cv00672
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Berman Cooper
Defendant:
Scott A. Middlebrooks, FNU Altizer and FNU McKenney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Altizer v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2011cv02675
Plaintiff:
Gary Wayne Altizer
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and Commonwealth Surgical Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv01538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McKenzie v. Batts, et al.
as 1:2011cv00622
Plaintiff:
Cassie Elizabeth McKenzie
Defendant:
Myron L. Batts and Tina Altizer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
