Cases 71 - 80 of 80
Murray et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2009cv00329
Plaintiff:
Vashti Murray, John Tucker, Jerome Long and others
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
West v. Turner
as 2:2008cv15239
Plaintiff:
Monica West
Defendant:
Michael Anthony Turner and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Turner v. Yaratha et al
as 2:2008cv00342
Plaintiff:
Anthony Turner
Defendant:
Dr. S. Yaratha, Charles Davis and James S. Reinhard
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Turner v. Doe et al
as 3:2008cv00432
Plaintiff:
Anthony Turner
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe and I.D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Turner v. Jenkins
as 2:2007cv00981
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Turner
Respondent:
Larry Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. Unknown
as 7:2007cv00531
Petitioner:
Anthony Turner
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. McBride
as 3:2007cv00059
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Turner
Defendant:
Thomas McBride
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. City of New York et al
as 1:2007cv03691
Plaintiff:
Maurice Scott, Maurice Scott, Maurice Scott and others
Defendant:
City of New York, Martin F. Horn, Carolyn Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. McBride
as 5:2007cv00250
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Turner
Defendant:
Thomas McBride
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin et al v. New York City Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2007cv00530
Plaintiff:
Anthony Devon Griffin and Ebony Samuel
Defendant:
New York City Department of Correction, Gemyse Brown, Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
