Cases 71 - 80 of 189
USA v. Michael Iverson
as 16-51034
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL GEORGE IVERSON, also known as Michael George Byrnes, also known as Michael Byrns, also known as Michael G. Iverson, also known as Mike Bernard, also known as John P. Byrns, also known as Michael Barnes, also known as J. D. Barnes, also known as Mi
United States of America v. Barnes
as 3:2016cv00128
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael D. Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Barnes v. Attorney General State of Louisiana
as 2:2016cv05986
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Barnes
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00515
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Barnes
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Barnes v. Ector Co. Jail
as 5:2015cv00938
Plaintiff:
Eddie D. Barnes
Defendant:
Ector Co. Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Ector Co. Jail
as 7:2015cv00196
Plaintiff:
Eddie D. Barnes
Defendant:
Ector Co. Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Cook County Sheriff et al
as 1:2015cv09541
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Barnes
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff and Lt. Deltz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv08458
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Barnes
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Department of Police, Chicago Police-Area and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alan Garcia et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00101
Plaintiff:
Alan Garcia , Tommy Calhoun , Cherry Candy and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company , aaiPharma Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
