Cases 71 - 80 of 89
Parker v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2010cv00195
Plaintiff:
David A. Parker
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Henderson v. Parker et al
as 6:2010cv00283
Petitioner:
Mikel Ray Henderson
Respondent:
David L Parker and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henderson v. Parker et al
as 5:2010cv00759
Petitioner:
Mikel Ray Henderson
Respondent:
David L Parker and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOON v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2010cv00126
Respondent:
ASSOCIATE WARDEN OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, ASSOCIATE WARDEN OF PROGRAMS, R. BASKERVILLE and others
Petitioner:
DARNELL WESLY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Donald Smiley v. David Parker
as 09-2335
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD LEON SMILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID STANLEY PARKER, D.O.C., Worldwide Et Al, NATION BANK OF AMERICA and others
Smiley v. Parker et al
as 2:2009cv00551
Plaintiff:
Donald Leon Smiley
Defendant:
David (Stanley) Parker, D.O.C. Worldwide Et Al, Nation Bank of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Smiley v. Parker
as 2:2009cv00501
Plaintiff:
Donald Leon Smiley
Defendant:
David Stanley Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fraud
Parker v. State of Virginia, et al
as 3:2009cv00425
Plaintiff:
David Clinton Parker
Defendant:
State of Virginia - Dinwiddie Circuit Court and Thomas V. Warren
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1231 (a)(6) Due Process Clause
Parker v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
as 3:2009cv00424
Plaintiff:
David Clinton Parker
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
PARKER v. ASTRUE
as 5:2009cv00189
Defendant:
MICHAEL J ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
DAVID A PARKER
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
