Cases 71 - 80 of 472
WEBSTER v. INTERMATIC, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv01903
Defendant:
John Doe #14 and Intermatic, Inc.
Plaintiff:
PAUL AND MARIE WEBSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matthew Griffin v. CoreCivic, et al
as 20-17177
Defendant / Appellee:
CORECIVIC, a Maryland Corporation, R. ACUNA, Captain - Previously named as Doe 1 and Unknown Acuna, WILLIAM PINKERTON, Correctional Officer - Previously named as: Doe 6 and Unknown Pinkerton and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW JAMES GRIFFIN
Doe 1 et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2020cv09654
Plaintiff:
DOE 8, DOE 1, DOE 6 and others
Defendant:
U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CHAD R. WOLF and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
DOE 1 et al
as 2:2020cv09653
Plaintiff:
DOE 8, DOE 1, DOE 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
TSENG v. HARRIS et al
as 2:2020cv01121
Defendant:
DOE 14, DOE 1, DOE 5 and others
Plaintiff:
YILI TSENG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Washington v. Kester et al
as 3:2020cv50266
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John or Jane Doe 7, John or Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MENDOZA v. INCH et al
as 4:2020cv00214
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 19, JOHN DOE 21, BRIAN LEACH and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE RICHARD MENDOZA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KS-Doe-1 et al v. Holy See, State of Vatican City et al
as 1:2020cv00247
Plaintiff:
KS-Doe, KS-Doe-16, KS-Doe-2a and others
Defendant:
Rev. Frederick Fingerle, Attorney(s) ABC and Accountant(s) XYZ, Calasanctius School of Buffalo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Sampson v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2020cv00741
Defendant:
Timothy Dugan, Barry Hickerson, Nicholas Evans and others
Plaintiff:
Lorinzo Sampson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe #14 v. Backpage.com LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00157
Defendant:
backpage.com, LLC, Carl Ferrer and Backpage.com LLC
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe #14
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
