Cases 71 - 80 of 106
George Clark v. Kenneth Romanowski
as 13-1135
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEORGE EDWARD CLARK
Respondent - Appellee:
KENNETH ROMANOWSKI, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00191
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Clark et al v. Target Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00208
Plaintiff:
Cloe Clark and Edward Clark
Defendant:
Target Corporation and Roto-Rooter Services Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CLARK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2012cv05856
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD CLARK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bueno et al v. Publishers Circulation Fufillment, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01106
Plaintiff:
Robert Bueno , Edward Clark and Cory Garmon
Defendant:
Publishers Circulation Fufillment, Inc., Ronald Craig, Ronald Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
CLARK v. BOROUGH OF SEASIDE HEIGHTS et al
as 3:2012cv03760
Plaintiff:
EDWARD CLARK
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF SEASIDE HEIGHTS, THOMAS BOYD, DETECTIVE STEPHEN KORMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Jackson County Detention Center
as 4:2012cv00706
Petitioner:
Lamon Edward Clark, Sr.
Respondent:
Jackson County Detention Center
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clark v. Lapetit et al
as 1:2012cv00877
Plaintiff:
James Edward Clark
Defendant:
Lieutenant Lapetit, Seargeant Callahan, H Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Trinity USA Operating, LLC v. Abercrombie
as 2:2011cv00246
Plaintiff:
Trinity USA Operating, LLC
Defendant:
Betty J. Allen, Ruby Jean Ambrose, Mattie Ruth Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
