Cases 71 - 80 of 109
Martinez et al. v. Illinois National Insurance Company
as 1:2015cv01166
Defendant:
Illinois National Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Jose Martinez and Eduardo Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Luis F. Gutierrez v. Eduardo Garcia
as 2:2015cv03727
Defendant:
Eduardo Garcia
Plaintiff:
Luis Gutierrez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
STATIC CONTROL COMPONENTS, INC. v. PRINTING TECHNOLOGY, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv00950
Plaintiff:
STATIC CONTROL COMPONENTS, INC.
Defendant:
PRINTING TECHNOLOGY, INC., PETER DESALAY, EDUARDO GARCIA DE ALBA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eduardo-Garcia-Cortez v. Jack Fox
as 2:2014cv08744
Respondent:
Jack Fox
Petitioner:
Eduardo Garcia-Cortez
USA v. Rogelio Garcia-Martinez
as 14-41028
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROGELIO GARCIA-MARTINEZ, also known as Eduardo Garcia-Martinez, also known as Gerardo Garcia-Barbosa
Eduardo Garcia Garcia v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-71235
Petitioner:
EDUARDO GARCIA GARCIA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Garcia v. Garcia
as 3:2014cv00073
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Garcia
Defendant:
Aurelia Garcia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bogner e al v. Rio Equity, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00189
Counter Defendant:
Gabriela Bogner, Eduardo Garcia, Ellen Hilliard and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriela Bogner, Eduardo Garcia, Ellen Hilliard and others
Counter Plaintiff:
Natin "Nate" Paul and Rio Equity, LLC
Defendant:
Natin "Nate" Paul and Rio Equity, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00083
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
