Cases 71 - 80 of 1,246
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
CONLEY v. HEARD et al
as 1:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
KARRI MICHELLE CONLEY
Defendant:
DAVID LEE HEARD, ROBERT SEAN HOLDAWAY, SR, SALVATORE MIRANTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eldridge v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2023cv05066
Plaintiff:
Candy Dawn Eldridge
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kohen Uhuru v. Laura Eldridge, et al
as 23-15398
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KOHEN DIALLO UHURU
Defendant / Appellee:
LAURA ELDRIDGE, KIM PETERSEN, JOSIE GASTELO, Warden and others
ELDRIDGE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00699
Petitioner:
KRISTINE ELDRIDGE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Star 3-Star 2022-SFR 3 Borrower L.P. v. Cochran
as 1:2023cv01466
Plaintiff:
Star 3-Star 2022-SFR 3 Borrower L.P.
Defendant:
Eldridge Cochran
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ELDRIDGE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09797
Plaintiff:
ZACK GREGORY ELDRIDGE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ELDRIDGE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09355
Plaintiff:
BILL EDWARD ELDRIDGE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCCURDY v. TOWN OF BRUNSWICK et al
as 2:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
PRESCOTT MCCURDY
Defendant:
TOWN OF BRUNSWICK, JOHN ELDRIDGE, OFFICER HODGDON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Eldridge v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Virginia Eldridge
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
