Cases 71 - 80 of 85
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00417
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Hamilton Jay Curtis v. Federal Protective Service et al
as 5:2012cv02075
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Jay Curtis
Defendant:
Doe Security Officer, Federal Protective Service and M M Taylor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3942
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kawaljeet Tagore v. USA, et al
as 12-20214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAWALJEET K. TAGORE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, FEDERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICE and others
Hill v. Dayton et al
as 0:2012cv00738
Plaintiff:
Melissa Hill
Defendant:
Minneapolis, City of , Amy Vreeland , United States Federal Protective Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Blume v. Supilanas et al
as 2:2011cv00146
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Blume
Defendant:
Mary Jean Supilanas, John W. Nau, Landon T. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv09476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Musumeci v. The United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2010cv03370
Plaintiff:
Antonio Musumeci
Defendant:
The United States Department of Homeland Security, The Federal Protective Service, Clifford Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morgan v. Napolitano
as 2:2009cv02649
Plaintiff:
John P. Morgan
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
