Cases 71 - 80 of 95
Kinner v. Moore et al
as 2:2015cv02105
Defendant:
Moore, Aston Smith, Maurice Wright and others
Plaintiff:
Kinner and Timothy Kinner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ridings v. Bethea et al
as 5:2014cv00290
Plaintiff:
Joshua Michael Ridings
Defendant:
FNU Bethea, FNU Baker, FNU Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holmes v. Moore et al
as 1:2014cv00084
Plaintiff:
Eugene T. Holmes
Defendant:
Tim Moore, Gregory S. McIntyre, David Teddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Collier County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2014cv00098
Plaintiff:
Shakir D. Battle
Defendant:
Collier County Sheriff's Office, Kevin J. Rambosk and FNU Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Grounds et al
as 5:2013cv00130
Plaintiff:
Ruben Solis Anderson
Defendant:
D Grounds, FNU Calfee, W Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Wilson et al
as 6:2013cv00164
Defendant:
FNU Arps, FNU Brown, FNU Chaney and others
Plaintiff:
Maxine Kendrick Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Wilson et al
as 1:2013cv00302
Plaintiff:
Maxine Kendrick Hernandez
Defendant:
FNU Wilson, FNU Maryland, FNU Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Childress v. City of Charleston Police Department et al
as 2:2013cv01225
Plaintiff:
Tessa R R G C Childress
Defendant:
City of Charleston Police Department, Chito T Walker, Officer Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bussard v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
Sean Robert Bussard
Defendant:
Richard Roundtree, Gene Johnson, Michael Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rochester v. Thrash et al
as 1:2012cv00184
Petitioner:
Julian E. Rochester
Respondent:
T. W. Thrash, J. F. King, B. Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
