Cases 71 - 80 of 104
Muhammad v. Murphy et al
as 3:2018cv02925
Plaintiff:
Ray Muhammad
Defendant:
Hunter Murphy, John Arrowood and Wanda G. Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant et al v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2018cv00607
Plaintiff:
Anthony G Bryant and Bryant Group Inc
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Beth Drake, US Department of Housing and Urban Development and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Bryant v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2018cv00606
Plaintiff:
Anthony G Bryant
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Bryant v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00973
Plaintiff:
Charlene G Bryant
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mizzoni v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2017cv01482
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, G Bryant, James Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mizzoni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarence Bryant v. State of Iowa
as 16-3272
Petitioner:
Clarence G. Bryant
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Bryant v. State of Iowa
as 4:2016cv00334
Petitioner:
Clarence G. Bryant
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bryant v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv00354
Plaintiff:
Angela G. Bryant
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CLB Development Partners v. Barrett et al
as 2:2015cv00008
Plaintiff:
CLB Development Partners
Defendant:
Stephen M. Barrett, Michael S. Rowe and Craig G. Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LaBelle et al v. Bryant et al
as 5:2014cv00158
Plaintiff:
Christine LaBelle and S.L.
Defendant:
William G. Bryant and Superior Bulk Logistics Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
