Cases 71 - 80 of 142
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
v. Waters et al
as 2:2015cv00282
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Waters
Defendant:
The Geo Group, Incorporated, Ed Wright, Daniel Calhoun, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Thompson, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 15-6817
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL CLEVELAND THOMPSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, VDOC, DAVID B. EVERETT, Regional Operations Chief, VDOC Eastern Region, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Dilio Escarria-Montano v. Wayane Phillips, et al
as 15-10399
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DILIO ANTONIO ESCARRIA-MONTANO
Defendant - Appellee:
WAYANE PHILLIPS, GEO Group, Incorporated in his individual capacity and GLEN BALINAO, GEO Group, Incorporated, in his individual capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rashid Kirkland v. Mr. Thoma
as 15-6531
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RASHID GARY KIRKLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. THOMAS and THE GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED
Wellever v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv00634
Plaintiff:
Gary Wellever
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, GEO Group Incorporated, Amber Norton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gentry Smith v. V. Horton, et al
as 15-60227
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GENTRY TRE-MAINE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
V. HORTON, Warden at East Mississippi Correctional Facility, GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED, Operator of East Mississippi Correctional Facility, BART GRIMES, Warden at East Mississippi Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1614
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.