Cases 71 - 80 of 124
Cooper v. CDCR et al
as 2:2013cv01233
Plaintiff:
James D. Cooper
Defendant:
CDCR and Solano County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEC v. James Dougla
as 12-4287
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES L. DOUGLAS, aka James L. Cooper
Cooper v. Secretary Department of Corrections
as 8:2012cv01947
Petitioner:
James Richard Cooper
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cooper v. Anderson et al
as 4:2012cv00487
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooper
Defendant:
Dee Anderson, Joseph Thornhill and Tarrant County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Sheriff Dee Anderson et al
as 4:2012cv00485
Plaintiff:
James Edward Cooper
Defendant:
Sheriff Dee Anderson, Joseph Thornhill and Tarrant County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James A. Cooper v. USA
as 12-2350
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES A. COOPER
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cooper v. Mount Olive Correctional Complex et al
as 2:2012cv00650
Plaintiff:
James Aaron Cooper, III
Defendant:
Mount Olive Correctional Complex, Wexford Health Services and Humayan Rashid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pissed Away N6VC, LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company v. Cooper
as 2:2011cv04345
Plaintiff:
Pissed Away N6VC, LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company
Defendant:
James F. Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
AMERIHOST FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC. v. HOTEL CAPITAL GROUP XXIII, LLC, et al
as 2:2011cv02058
Plaintiff:
AMERIHOST FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
HOTEL CAPITAL GROUP XXIII, LLC, ROGER M HOY and JAMES K COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
