Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 105
KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. v. AMGEN, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv01460
Plaintiff: KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. and KINNEY DRUGS
Defendant: Actavis Pharma Inc., Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re: Sensipar (Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets) Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2019md02895
Not Classified By Court: UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund, Actavis Pharma Inc., Cipla Ltd. and others
Plaintiff: Cesar Castillo, Inc. and KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
In Re: In re: Sensipar (Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets) Antitrust Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re HIV Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02573
Plaintiff: Peter Staley, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Insurance Trust Fund, Gregg S. Gonsalves, PhD and others
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson Inc., E. R. Squibb & Sons, LLC, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Amicus Curiae: HIV Organizations and Federal Trade Commission
Respondent: State of New Mexico ex rel. Hector H. Balderas, New Mexico Attorney General
Petitioner: Jacksonville Police Officers and Fire Fighters Health Insurance Trust and John F Cogan
Interested Party: Designating non-party Aurobindo USA, Inc., Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. and Strides Pharma, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Cipla USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. v. AMGEN, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv01510
Plaintiff: KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. and KINNEY DRUGS
Defendant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., AMGEN, INC., ACTAVIS PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
The City of Rome, New York v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 6:2019cv00376
Defendant: Specgx, LLC, Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC and others
Plaintiff: The City of Rome, New York
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv12293
Defendant: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novartis AG and Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Plaintiff: KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. a/k/a Kinney Drugs, Inc., KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. and Kinney Drugs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
City of Utica, New York v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2018op46359
Defendant: Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff: City of Utica, New York
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Syracuse, New York v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2018op46169
Defendant: Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff: City of Syracuse, New York
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Syracuse, New York v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 5:2018cv01184
Defendant: Specgx, LLC, McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC and others
Plaintiff: City of Syracuse, New York
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2018md02836
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., MSP Singapore Co. LLC and others
Plaintiff: FWK Holdings, LLC, HEB Grocery Company L.P., All End Payer Plaintiffs and others
In Re: In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
Interested Party: Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc., Apotex USA, Inc. and Apotex Corp., WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and others
Petitioner: AmerisourceBergen Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, H.D. Smith, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Giant Eagle, Inc., Burlington Drug Company, Inc., Dakota Drug, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?