Cases 71 - 80 of 85
THOMPSON V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv35654
Plaintiff:
KENNETH E. THOMPSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Thompson v. NCO Financial Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv06648
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Thompson
Defendant:
NCO Financial Systems, Inc. and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
David Howeth, Jr. v. David Hudson, et al
as 09-40317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID HOWETH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID L HUDSON, JEFFERY CALFEE, JOSEPH W WILSON and others
Richard Taylor v. Leslie Woods, et al
as 09-40234
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD OWEN TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
LESLIE WOODS, KEVIN MOORE, MICHAEL W SIZEMORE and others
Thompson v. Quarterman
as 4:2009cv00297
Petitioner:
Kenneth Gregory Thompson, Jr
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jerry McClarin v. City of Savannah, Tennessee, et al
as 08-6134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY LEE MCCLARIN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SAVANNAH, TENNESSEE
Defendant:
KENNETH J. THOMPSON, both individually and in his official capacity as a law enforcement officer for Savannah, Tennessee
Kenneth Thompson v. Ulep
as 08-7159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH BERNARD THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ULEP, Doctor at Sussex 2 State Prison and MCGEE, Dentist at Sussex 2 State Prison
THOMPSON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2008cv00181
Plaintiff:
KENNETH E. THOMPSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Thompson v. Livingston
as 4:2008cv01315
Petitioner:
Kenneth Gregory Thompson
Respondent:
Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thompson v. O'Bryant et al
as 1:2008cv00068
Plaintiff:
Kenneth N. Thompson
Defendant:
Christopher J. O'Bryant, Jason Crouch, Marlene Hammer and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
