Cases 71 - 80 of 1,116
Jackson v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03195
Plaintiff:
Bobby L Jackson and Bobby L. Jackson
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc. and BP America Production Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Jackson v. Corey
as 9:2022cv00838
Petitioner:
Constantinee L. Jackson
Respondent:
J. Corey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Wylie
as 22-1648
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raymond L. Jackson
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew J. Wylie, Clinton County District Attorney
Jackson v. Lumpkin
as 22-20411
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Allen L. Jackson
Defendant / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, FNU Lewis, Sergeant and FNU Bazan, Lieutenant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bank of America, N.A., v. Caviel et al
as 4:2022cv02747
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, N.A.,
Defendant:
Rhett Caviel, Morgan L. Jackson, Hewen P. Humphrey, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. USA
as 1:2022cv02299
Petitioner:
David L. Jackson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rachel Clark v. William Jackson
as 22-5553
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RACHEL CLARK
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM L. JACKSON, in his Individual and Official capacity as the CEO of Chattanooga-Hamilton Hospital, dba Erlanger Health System
Christopher Jackson v. Chad Vartanian, et al
as 22-2051
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER L. JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAD VARTANIAN and RICHARD BILSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
